kittylooki.blogg.se - Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro

#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro full
#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro pro
#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro software
#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro professional

#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro pro

The big change in DxO Optics Pro 10 is what the company is calling ClearView. Of the three, it is Optics Pro 10 that is the most significant update, with one major new feature, and some very important updates in other areas as well. In its latest incarnation, the DxO Photo Suite - whose components can be bought together or separately - consists of DxO Optics Pro 10, DxO FilmPack 5, and DxO ViewPoint 2.5. With the new differentiation by Optics Pro features, there's no need for the company to draw an arbitrary line in the sand as to which photographers need to pay the higher price.

#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro professional

From DxO's perspective, the reason for the change is that it's become increasingly difficult to differentiate between what constitutes a professional camera, and what is an enthusiast model. In a nutshell, instead of segmenting the Essential and Elite versions of the app based on your camera model, Optics Pro is now compatible with all supported cameras in both versions, but certain higher-end features are withheld for the Elite version of the app. That last point in particular is huge news for DxO's customers. A year later, though, the company has taken things to the next level, with significant updates to its three main imaging apps, a new look for the DxO brand, and a complete rethink of its pricing structure.

#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro software

To use it properly you need to use DxO Pro as a RAW converter.Over the years, we've seen some pretty significant updates to French software company DxO Labs' flagship Optics Pro raw image processing app, not least of which was last year's Optics Pro 9, which brought a radically rethough noise-processing engine. Viewpoint corrects only (2), DxO Pro both (1) and (2)ĭxO noise reduction is very good and yes, this is partially due to sensor profiling.

Optically perfect but not looking right for a human (anamorphosis, keystoning etc.).

Viewpoint does not correct all lens distortion like Pro does. The only reason you might need Viewpoint if you already have Pro is that Viewpoint can be used as a Photoshop plugin. I have both (there was a discount on Viewpoint for Pro owners). Or at least that was true for 7.ĭxO Optics Pro does much more than DxO Viewpoint and includes all corrections that Viewpoint does. I have tried both and there is no extra fucntionality in Elite except for the added camera/lens corrections.

#Dxo viewpoint vs optics pro full

Elite handles those plus the camera/lens combinations considered to ber higher end (typically, I believe, full frame) and is much more expensive. Standard handles the camera/lens combinations considered to be the most common. OP is sold in two versions, Standard and Elite. This functionality is already included in OP but is sold as a separate product for those who want only that functionality. ViewPoint is (or at least was the last time I used it) software for doing perspective adjustment only. OP also includes automatic lens distortion software for a range of cameras and images and provides a way to manually correct images for perspective. OP will attempt a first shot at making the proper adjustments (they are pretty good at that) and you can correct and/or change their settings. You can adjust all of the things you would normally want to adjust - exposure, sharpness, noise reduction, white point, etc. OP (Optics Pro) is software designed to do the whole range of image adjustments. I have not used Dxo's software since 7 but here is what I know from that version. So DXO would be mostly for correction of lens distortion which it seams to do better than others especially with extreme wideangle lenses and corners that are pulled out etc.Īlso the sensor profiling is interresting if it does better Noise reduction due to that? These camera/lenses produce rather distorted RAW files. I have Sony RX100 and Panasonic LX5 with wide conversion and a G5 with some lenses (also with a wide converter). I also plan to buy PhotoNinja that I have on test now since it is so good with retrieving blown highlights. RAW development is not that important, I can do that in Silkypix for Panasonic or Adobe DNG converter / Camera RAW in Photoshop Elements 10, RawTherapee etc that I all have. My main interest in these software is the lens and sensor profiling that DXO does, is there any difference in those areas? What is in each of the softwares that the other doesn't have? I wonder if anyone here can give a view of the differences of these two softwares? I have read on DXOs web, but can't really find out the answer there.